Close

Quickview Mode Channel Finder

You don't have Adobe Flash Player

You need the Adobe Flash Player to experience Dipdive media.

Download

A Lifestyle Engine for Music, Arts, Action & More

Welcome, Guest Log in Sign up

Close Sign up

DipPolitics

Strange Victory

from DipPolitics added 3 June, 2008 at 06:22 AM

avatar
hillel-aron
wrote 1 yr ago
 
 

Image

It was 10:46 am (I live in Los Angeles) when I got a twitter message from Slate correspondent John Dickersonreading: “AP calls it for this Obama fellow.” I lunged to my computer and verified that, yes, the race for the democratic nomination was finally over. Barack Obama had won. I couldn’t help but feel that this was a historical moment. Perhaps this was because every website I clicked on read, “HISTORIC MOMENT.”

It’s been more than a year since Obama declared his candidacy. I remember people telling me back then that there was no way in hell that a black man was going to get the nomination. I considered it a bit of a long shot myself but was hopeful (yes, I was hopeful before being hopeful was cool).

Now, Obama has arguably been the presumptive nominee for months. Not a day goes by without Obama and McCain taking a couple of shots at each other. But the news still felt important. After all, just because victory is inevitable doesn’t mean you shouldn’t celebrate it.

The main drama of the night centered around what Hillary Clinton would say. Speculation was rampant. Would she concede? Would she drop out? Would she endorse Obama? Her speech, unlike most primary night speeches, was not leaked to the press.

Tension only heightened after McCain’s speech. He seemed to be pandering to disaffected Hillary supporters when he said, “The media often overlooked how compassionately [Senator Clinton] spoke to the concerns and dreams of millions of Americans, and she deserves a lot more appreciation than she sometimes received.” He then gave Obama the backhanded compliment to end all backhanded compliments when he said, “Pundits and party elders have declared that Senator Obama will be my opponent.”

Surely, I thought, Hillary would respond to this. Surely she would reassure us that McCain did not speak for her.
It was, in retrospect, a bad omen when we learned that Hillary would be speaking in a basement with no televisions and no cell phone service — a veritable bunker. And her speech gave no indication that the Clinton campaign was in any way connected to reality. Terry McAuliffe introduced her as “the next President of the United States of America” — all while MSNBC and CNN were running graphics declaring Obama the presumptive nominee.

What she said was astonishing. She congratulated Obama on the race he had “run,” not won. She complimented his campaign’s achievements, but said nothing nice about him. She, again, claimed to have won the popular vote. She touted the states where she’d been victorious. She claimed that she was the “strongest candidate.” She said, “I often felt that each of your votes was a prayer for our nation.” On a night where many were calling for party unity, Hillary Clinton was making herself sound like the messiah. Or maybe a martyr.

But the kicker was when she said, “I want the nearly 18 million Americans who voted for me to be respected, to be heard and no longer to be invisible.” Wasn’t she implying that they would be invisible if Obama got the nomination? Don’t both of these candidates agree on every major issue?

Shockingly, she did not mention John McCain once. Or George W. Bush.

The question is why? Is it money? After all, her campaign is millions in debt, and her website (which she directed people to yet again) is still taking donations (Worst. Investment. Ever). She might be angling for the Vice President slot, although this would certainly be a strange way of going about it. After all, if Obama gives it to her now, he risks looking weak — like he was forced into it.

Or maybe she’s just delusional.

I wanted to write about Obama’s victory tonight. Because that’s what tonight is about. It is a historic moment, and not just because all the websites say so. But I can’t help but feel angry at Hillary Clinton, who seems so protective of her own supporters and yet so indifferent to everyone else.

--Hillel Aron

 

 

Photos by barackobamadotcom

avatar hillel-aron wrote 1 year and 5 months ago

 

Comments

Archive said 1 year and 1 month ago:

Jkt said: Amen.
 

Archive said 1 year and 1 month ago:

Terri said: Why do the Americans insist on acting like ignorant, uneducated fools simply following the herd. Why do you make yourselves stupid?? Don't you realise that what happens in America affects the rest of the world? Don't you see that voting for McCain is just bringing Bush back into power. Do you really enjoy the Iraq situation, are you happy seeing your people die in Iraq for a cause that is not yours? Wait.......... there is no cause! What exactly have your benefitted from the war in Iraq? Do you not want change? Are you happy with the politics of old? Are you happy with your country being run by old men or women who should be enjoying thier retirment? Do you not see that McCain is too old too change - look at his policies, look at what he stands for, look at what he proposes to do during his term - a prime example is to continue to sent more troops to Iraq. Do you need to be constantly involved in some war to feel good about yourselves? Do you even know or understand how you went from being the most respected nation to the bottom of the barrel? How does a sour loser like Hillary be applauded? Is this they wasy of the americans to be such sour losers? It shows that with Hillary nothing was going to change. She does not have the decency to advise her 18million? supporters to support the elected Democratic nominee, instead she says wants them to be respected as if that was what Obama was going to do. How disrespectful to Obama. Why doesn't she just hand the presidency to McCain like she really wants. It's time for change and that change will come through Obama. Research your candidates. Go to their websites where they each state where they stand, their records and what they intend to do about the issues. Obama has an excellent booklet called "Blueprint For Change", McCain just bumbles around. It is amazing and unbelievable that us non-americans are more aware and clued up as to where your candidates stand on issue. The rest of world is ready for change, the world wants change. Americans wake up!
 

Archive said 1 year and 1 month ago:

Charles said: After reading the comments of self proclaimed smart Americans ,I now believe that most are idiots!!! We Germany (Europeans) believe that most of you uneducated angry crazy fools will be used by rebublicans posing as Democrates on line (angry Clinton supporters) and persuading voters to vote for that old bad tempered war man named Macain. The world is already thinking positive of USA because of an inspiring candidate like Obama. Now I believe why most Clinton supporters are scum heads who can be easily fooled by Rebublicans who have pulled a great nation like USA so low that if they elect Macain, we Europeans will pull back and laugh at your ignorant and stupidity!!!(I guess you dont even care, fools!!!) However I know that young and smart Americans will see the light and go with change (Obama)as the world wants change. My advise for positive thinking Americans is to post comments on blogs advising Clinton supporters that hard core Rebublicans are disguising as democrates on line to fool them as they are illitrates and can be easily fooled . FRom Bavaria Germany.
 

Archive said 1 year and 1 month ago:

Keir said: I want to ask why too. Why is there no hope for Palestinians? Why is there no change for those most miserable of all who have been so long subject to the foreign policy of the USA through its ally, Israel? Why is Jerusalem lost by conquest for them? Why is this fine man prostrate before AIPAC? You know, the cynical side of me says the Palestinians have their best chance with Mr. Obama. Certainly, Hillary Clinton would be a misery for them, but I also am concerned that Mr. Obama waited until after President Carter's endorsement to meet with AIPAC and tow that most disgusting of lines in search of votes and money. Hey, maybe it's the old politics after all?
 

Add comment

You need to be logged in to do this

You will need a Dipdive account and you will need to be
logged in to use this function. An account is free, let's create one right now!